![]() | ![]() |
MESN is also activated
in case of any large disaster where statewide communications may
be necessary. MON (CW) 3.585
MHz
Some ARES forms are available here, and the rest are available at the ARRL website. Missouri
Section Emergency Coordinator
|
Amateur Radio; Emergency Communications, Asset or Liability? Part 1 Gene A. Bess, WØGAB
Missouri-ARES Section Training Coordinator
Over nearly thirty years of involvement
in emergency communications in amateur radio, the military and public safety;
I have been asked many times for my input in matters pertaining to
the emergency communications capabilities of the Amateur Radio Service. Having
served on both sides of the fence, I suppose one does sometimes have the
advantage of being able to see the forest, in spite of all those trees.
The truth is, those not directly involved
in Amateur Radio, and in some cases, those that are; do not fully understand
how truly unique Amateur Radio is. From the standpoint of it’s
potential as an emergency communications asset, unlike the communications
systems normally deployed by public safety agencies; Amateur Radio has the
ability to adapt and expand to meet the rapidly changing requirements
of any communications
emergency. This is not the case with any other public safety radio
system, no matter how large, well designed or financed it might be. This
aspect of the Amateur Radio Service alone is in no small way responsible
for our very existence, and one of the reasons why nearly every nation on
the planet has set aside very valuable radio spectrum to it.
Our many available modes and bands allow
us flexibility unmatched by any other single communications service. In an
emergency, we can simply select additional channels to handle the increased
traffic load. Our spectrum space is nearly limitless, whereas even the largest
public safety agency system has a finite number of channels available. Our
high frequency capabilities using NVIS and other techniques, allows communications
in any terrain, without the support of fragile infrastructure, such
as repeaters. Even with all our capabilities, there are some very real, and
not so real shortcomings of our service in the minds of some public officials.
Although there are many Emergency Managers,
public safety agency chiefs and elected public officials with Amateur Radio
Licenses; even these professionals are often of the opinion that our service
is more a liability than an asset, when it comes to it’s use
in an actual emergency. Unfortunately for all concerned, this opinion is
often not without foundation. Although from a technical point
of view, there is little doubt our service has potential as
an asset to public safety in an emergency, the volunteer nature of
our service, if not it’s very name; is often the greatest obstacle
to its’ greater acceptance
and utilization by those
agencies we seek to serve.
To many, the very word amateur is associated
with being less than professional, or something less than expert. When one
is used to dealing with human lives and property, you can see where a term
like "amateur
paramedic", or "amateur police officer" might give one pause, where the term "professional
paramedic" or "police professional" might invoke completely different
feelings. Amateur, as in ‘Amateur Radio’ of course, reflects
the unpaid, volunteer nature of the service, i.e., ‘amateur athlete’.
But this is an example of why we are sometimes met with some reservation on
the part of those charged with the
public safety, when it comes to being utilized
in their emergency operations plans. This however, is only one example, and
one more easily dealt with. There are, unfortunately, other examples
that are more difficult to overcome.
There are ‘volunteer paramedics’ and "volunteer fire
fighters" and we know that this reflects only the fact they are unpaid for
their services to the public. This does not mean they are less trained than
their paid counterparts, or that they are exempt from meeting certain standards
of education and conduct. Perhaps we should move to have the term Amateur Radio
Operator changed to Volunteer Radio Operator? I would probably not support
that idea, but I certainly do support becoming more like our volunteer cousins,
the fire fighters and paramedics. These folks train and work very hard, and
subject themselves to
certain demands of conduct, training and experience.
Certainly a person having just completed
basic training as a fire fighter, is not going to be expected by the public,
his peers, or his superiors to be as well suited to all aspects of the job,
as one who has undergone additional training above the basic level,
or one with more experience in the field. Why is it then that many of the
Amateur Radio fraternity feel that having an operator’s license makes
them an automatic asset to public safety communications? Unfortunately, this
attitude is held by many amateurs, and is an example of something in need
of change. A driving license gives one the right to drive upon the public
streets and highways, but does not entitle the driver to drive a heavy
truck for hire. It is the minimal requirement for additional training and experience.
A Technician or even an Extra Class Amateur
License does not make anyone an emergency communications expert, or even
an asset to the public safety. Unless one is willing to undergo additional
training and experience, and to subject one’s self to accepted standards
of conduct and discipline, these serve only as minimal requirements. An Emergency
Manager or Fire Chief is not going to place anyone at risk; including
his other personnel, and certainly not the public; without making very sure
you know what you are doing. In matters pertaining to emergency communications,
this means you are expected to know
more than how to hook up and use a radio transmitter and antenna.
You must also know something of how to conduct
yourself concerning sensitive communications, dealing with the press, your
limitations as well as your assets. If you expect to be dumped into
the middle of a forest fire to provide emergency communications
to professional and volunteer fire crews, then you had best also know the
basics of fire fighting, and how it related to your own safety,
that of the public at large, and the other members of ‘the team’. In
short, you might be the best communicator in the world, but if you
expect to be placed in the thick of it, you might want to know which way
the wind is blowing!
Until a Fire Chief or Emergency Manager
is relatively confident you will be more of an asset than a liability, he
or she is not going to utilize you in any meaningful way. At best he risks
a lawsuit, at worst he might be responsible for having cost someone’s
life. Unless you become part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
Be willing to view the issue from his or her perspective, and you will soon
realize there is more to it than just showing up with a car full of radios,
and an orange vest. If you are willing to show up for offered training, and
not just when there is a real emergency. If you are willing to listen as
well as talk. The Fire Chief or Emergency Manager might just move you and
your ARES group into his asset column, and out of the one headed ‘liabilities’.
Gene A. Bess, WØGAB
MO-ARES Section Training Coordinator
140 Marshall Drive St. Robert, MO 65584 Home: 573-759-3916
Work:573-336-5336 | |
| Contact the Missouri ARES webmaster for site questions or comments. |